Electrification of industry - the first step toward zero-emission and lower-cost production

Electrification of industry - the first step toward zero-emission and lower-cost production

Rising gas and coal prices, regulatory pressure from the EU ETS system, and increasing expectations from customers and investors regarding ESG are driving more and more industrial companies to seek ways to permanently reduce emissions and energy costs. Electrifying industrial processes - that is, replacing fossil fuel-based technologies with electricity-powered equipment - is becoming a natural and cost-effective direction for transformation. It’s a step toward decarbonization and regulatory compliance, as well as an opportunity to gain energy independence through the use of on-site energy sources.

Electrification of industry involves replacing technologies and equipment powered by fossil fuels with their electric counterparts. This includes both heat sources (e.g. boilers, furnaces, heaters) as well as machine drives or internal transport systems. Electricity becomes the main energy carrier in the facility and, where possible, comes from renewable energy sources (RES) or high-efficiency cogeneration.

How does the electrification process work?

The electrification process of an industrial plant usually takes place in two stages. In the first step, the company replaces fossil fuel-based installations – such as coal-fired steam boilers, gas dryers, or combustion engines – with electric devices. For example, water and steam boilers can be replaced with electric heaters, electrode boilers, or industrial heat pumps, which usually offer higher energy efficiency. Combustion or steam drives, on the other hand, can be replaced with electric motors controlled by inverters.

In the second stage, after electrifying the sources, the plant can proceed to "greening" the electricity supply, i.e. reducing the carbon footprint of the power it consumes. This is done by investing in on-site RES (e.g. PV installations on production hall rooftops or wind farms on plant grounds), purchasing green energy with guarantees of origin, or implementing biogas or even hydrogen cogeneration, which enables the simultaneous production of electricity and heat from a single fuel at very high efficiency. This sequence – first electrification, then decarbonization of the electricity source – allows for staggered investment and gradual environmental improvements, while also reducing costs.

Why switch to electric energy sources?

The main goal of electrification is to reduce Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions by moving away from fossil fuel combustion in favor of electricity, which can increasingly come from low-emission sources. Changing the energy source also allows companies to become independent from volatile prices of natural gas, coal, and heating oil, which can spike during global crises or wars.

Image
Electrification facilitates compliance with environmental requirements and ESG standards, which are important not only for regulatory alignment but also for the company's image and its relationships with business partners and financial institutions. In the coming years, the EU ETS system will tighten – free emission allowances will be phased out and the list of mandatory participants will expand, exposing affected companies to additional costs. Switching to electric power also opens the door to further modernization – such as integration with energy storage or flexible consumption management – which improves resilience and energy security.
Ph.D. Dominik Brach Vice President of the Management Board

Electricity cost vs. fossil fuel cost

Is electrification more expensive than traditional energy sources like coal or natural gas? The answer is not straightforward – it depends on the type of process, available technologies, and the scale of operations.

Fuel price vs. electricity price

In terms of energy units (kWh), fossil fuels are often cheaper – especially coal. However, electricity can be sourced from on-site RES or cogeneration, which significantly reduces grid purchase costs. Moreover, technologies like photovoltaic installations, which are virtually maintenance-free, have nearly zero operating costs.

Operating costs

Electric devices are easier to operate, cleaner, and more reliable. For example:

  • induction or electric heaters can reach efficiencies of 95–99%, whereas coal boilers often operate at only 72–80% efficiency;
  • no combustion means no need for flue gas treatment, system cleaning, ash storage, etc.
  • as a result, the total operating cost (OPEX) can be lower despite the higher unit price of electricity.

Energy efficiency – electricity beats fuels

Electrifying industry also significantly improves the energy efficiency of production equipment. For example:

  • electric boilers reach efficiencies of 95–99%, while gas-fired steam boilers typically average 88–90% annually,
  • induction furnaces offer efficiencies of 90–97%, compared to gas furnaces, which rarely exceed 60–70%,
  • industrial heat pumps can have a coefficient of performance (COP) between 2.5 and even 5, meaning they deliver several times more heat energy than the electrical energy they consume,
  • electric machine drives – especially synchronous motors or those with frequency converters – offer efficiencies of 93–98%, significantly outperforming many older combustion drives.

High efficiency not only reduces energy consumption but also minimizes heat losses and pollutant emissions, delivering both economic and environmental benefits.

Electrification and CO2 emission reduction

From a climate perspective, switching from fossil fuels to electricity (especially green electricity) is one of the most effective ways to reduce industrial emissions.

Lignite emits approx. 0.35 tons of CO2/MWh, natural gas about 0.2 tons of CO2/MWh, and RES energy – 0 tons of CO2.

If the electricity comes from the grid, emissions are still lower than from burning coal, and they can be further reduced by integrating PV, wind, or storage systems. This sequence is also typically followed in net-zero strategies – first, maximize energy efficiency to reduce demand, then electrify the facility and “green” the electricity. For net zero, remaining emissions should later be offset as well.

Hybrid transformation model – grid energy, RES, and cogeneration

Image

Not every facility can immediately switch entirely to its own green energy. That’s why hybrid solutions are becoming more popular, combining:

  • grid energy (sometimes partially green),
  • local RES sources – e.g. rooftop or ground-mounted photovoltaics,
  • cogeneration – simultaneous heat and power production, often from gas, biogas, or biomass,
  • energy storage systems, which are gaining popularity and enhance self-consumption and supply stability from green sources.

This model enables a phased transformation, reduces the carbon footprint, and minimizes cost risks.

Electrification and zero-emission strategy

Electrification is a key component of industrial decarbonization. Companies implementing such measures benefit from:

  • market competitiveness – more customers expect low-carbon products,
  • better access to financing – banks and funds prefer “green” projects,
  • lower regulatory risk from EU policies and better alignment with Fit for 55,
  • ESG reporting capabilities with real progress.

Summary

Electrification of industrial processes is a necessary step toward a modern, sustainable industry. Replacing fossil fuel-based technologies with electric solutions opens the door to decarbonization, higher energy efficiency, and integration with RES – which will become increasingly accessible and widespread in the coming years. While changing energy sources requires well-planned investments, it brings long-term benefits – from reducing energy costs to strengthening market competitiveness in a world increasingly sensitive to carbon footprints. Facilities that choose electrification will gain greater flexibility and security, the ability to implement modern energy management systems, and better preparedness for future regulatory changes.

Knowledge base

Typical payback periods of energy-saving technologies - an overview of solutions for industry

Investments in technologies that increase energy efficiency, such as cogeneration, heat pumps, compressed air production management systems, photovoltaics, LED lighting, and energy-efficient electric drives, bring a variety of benefits — from reducing operating costs, through improving power supply reliability, to lowering CO₂ emissions. Typical payback periods range from 2 to 5 years, making these technologies profitable both in the short and long term. The decision to choose the right solution should be preceded by a detailed analysis of the company’s needs, which DB Energy offers as part of its energy audits. The final choice of technology depends on the specific requirements and conditions of the enterprise, but one thing is certain — investments in energy efficiency always bring returns. Let’s take a closer look at some key solutions used by manufacturing companies and their typical payback periods.

Read more

How to select a cogeneration unit tailored to an industrial plant's needs?

Choosing the right cogeneration unit is a process that requires technical expertise and a deep understanding of the plant’s specific energy demands. In many cases, incorrect assumptions made during the planning phase can lead to a mismatch in unit capacity or the selection of technologies that fail to meet the plant’s energy requirements. This, in turn, results in suboptimal use of the cogeneration potential and increases the risk that the investment will not deliver the expected outcomes.

Read more
See all articles
Czekaj

Czekaj